The Connection Between Your New Biz Plan…And Being Acquired
Alright, I’ve probably already confused you with the title. The idea that your marketing plan is essential to your firm’s success surely isn’t new, but you’ve been thinking about that in more expected categories: New business gives you more options to say no to prospective clients who aren’t a great fit, but still have enough opportunity to fill the roster. Cycling your clients, regularly, on your terms, helps you keep prices higher. Service offering design is quite important, and since the easiest way to lose money is to have an entire division that a client doesn’t want to use, just sitting there, and so new business lets you favor clients that want to use most of your services, most of the time. Best of all, you constant opportunity allows you to reinvent your firm, which is a process best done one client at a time. So think of new business as leverage: you don’t have to “invest in the sale” because you have other options. You can experiment. You can lead the client, and when you run across a client who just wants you to do stuff, at their direction, you can move on and find someone who really values your work. Their Big Questions You know all this, but what does it have to do with an acquisition? When someone buys your firm, whether that’s a somewhat accidental or organic process, or whether you’ve hired a firm to conduct a sell-side search for you, they will inevitably have some quick questions. These are big questions, too, and each one represents a potential “stop sign” that pauses the discussions. Or if your answer isn’t that fatal to the process, it might just slow things down and make sure that the buyer protects themselves from any downside from that perceived defect in your firm. What They’ll Ask They’ll ask questions like this: What’s your growth curve been like? What’s your EBITDA percentage? How much of your revenue is recurring vs. project-based? Do you have any client concentration risks from one or more clients who represent too much of your billings? Why are you selling? How long do you want to stay around? What role would be willing to fill after the acquisition? Will you accept any of the sale price in rollover equity? How do you get opportunity in the top of your sales funnel? That last question is the one that I’m addressing in this article. Note, first, that the potential buyer is not asking about how you close sales. The buyer will safely assume that you are pretty good at sales. They’ll assume some base hits here and there, and the occasional home run, but they want to know how you get “at bats” so that you can swing at something. Why They Care The riskiest two things in an acquisition are these two: How long will the clients stay. How will you replace them when they leave. You’d think they’d care about your people, and while they do, it’s not at the top of the list. They want to know if this transaction will pay them back or solve some other goal over the long term. That’s why earnouts were first used widely in the early 2000s, and then very commonly during the 2008 crisis, and they’ve been a part of the acquisition world ever since: let’s share the risk with the seller so that a portion of the purchase price is subject to hitting certain performance targets over time. But even more than they, the buyer might very well want to pour some gasoline on that new business fire and speed up your growth. If your growth comes from flattering but unpredictable referrals, that’s not going to cut it. When they ask the question about how you dump opportunity into the top of the funnel, they want you to pull up a spreadsheet and then talk them through it: “Here’s a brief overview of our marketing plan. We typically start X number of conversations of month, keeping careful track in our CRM. These conversations originate from these three sources, usually. We typically close one-third of those, and on average it takes us 7 weeks from initial contact to signed contract. The average client relationship lasts Y months and yields Z in revenue and profit over that time period. At any given time, we have 19 active client relationships. Do you want me to go any deeper into any of those numbers?” Finally There are many reasons to have a strong marketing plan, but don’t forget that being acquired one day could go a lot better than it otherwise would if you have a good plan in place.
Your Four Competitive Advantages
This article is not about your positioning, which should be truly unique to you versus other firms in your category. I’ve covered that in great detail in this look at the Waterfall of Differentiation, where you try to put competitive distance between your firm and the other firms in the same category. The simple test for whether you’ve landed on something that will actually work is easily summed up in this question: “If I withheld my services from this potential client, how long would it take them to find what they deem to be a suitable substitute for my services?” And “they” is italicized because they get to define that, not you. The answer, if they are fair about it, should lead to them to a half dozen other firms from which they can choose. Inhouse = Specialized But this article isn’t about that. It’s more about how nearly every independent firm in the comms and marketing and advertising and digital and public relations space, as an entire group, is distinct from an inhouse department (sometimes known as client-side departments). In other words, why do they hire you instead of building out their own capacity? Some do, too, and in fact 80% of companies have some sort of internal capability. Some people will say that an internal department saves money, but that’s largely nonsense. I’ve authored those studies myself and there’s no cost savings to be had. No, the best reason to build a department is the same specialization question: we are creating a mix of professionals that know our space exceedingly well. All the other things that are also true of that department (like accessibility) usually work against them and not for them. So back to the question: why do companies—even the ones with internal departments—use firms like yours? There are four eternal reasons, and it’s good to keep these in your back pocket when you are pitching your services. Some of these you can talk about directly and some you should never mention, just because, even if they are absolutely true. Your Four Unique Advantages The really healthy independent firms like yours compete on a combination of these four things. You do many things that overlap with what your client is capable of, if they have an in-house department, but they do not have any of these four things, usually: People working for them that would never be caught dead working on the client side. These are your secret weapon. The misfits and rogues who are unquestionably brilliant (and difficult to manage sometimes, too). The only way your client has access to them is via a firm like yours or in a contractor/freelance relationship. External objectivity. They aren’t so close to the situation that they can’t see things. And when you see things, you have the courage to call them out, kindly. You do have that courage, right? Nimbleness without tons of layers and procedures. Yes, you do need process at your firm, but never let it start looking like your client’s process. Start a project the very same day, put the whole team into a “quick react” mode when something happens, etc. If you charge enough, this shouldn’t be burdensome. Pattern matching from seeing many situations like theirs, assuming here that your positioning takes advantage of this and that you aren’t a generalist firm. The client will have multiple people who have been at one or two other places, but your collective history has seen 40 or 75 of these. Other than your specialization, which should lead conversations, always keep these four in mind, too. If you’re talking about other stuff, it should be secondary to these four.
